Saturday, June 25, 2011

ஔவையாரும் empty CUP'um...


Few days back I was just snooping through some of the tamil magazines in the library and stepped upon one supplementary magazine that had the following quote boxed in the corner of a page.

எந்தெந்த பொருளின் மேல் உனக்கு ஆசை இல்லையோ அந்த பொருளால் உனக்கு துன்பம் இல்லை - ஔவையார் 


[Rough translation - Anything that you don't desire will not bring you suffering] 

So, what'z special in the above quote? This is just piece in midst of thousands of other spiritual quotes/advice's that we come across. But, the beauty I see in this quote is its simplicity and easyness to follow. How simple? One thing that immediately struck into my mind after reading this quote is the famous message from Gautama the Buddha "Desire is the cause of all suffering". This means, if you need to get out of suffering you need to stop desiring. In my opinion, this Buddhist quote is very abstract, heavy and raw. It just concludes the root-cause for suffering, but fails to mention the ways [easy ways of course!] to overcome suffering. The ways could have been mentioned in Buddhism, but how many have patience to read and follow Buddhist life in full to kill desire, overcome suffering and get liberated?. Everyone likes an easy and shortcut way to follow advices. If there is a machine that can make one enlightened in just few minutes, we will definitely be in the queue. Same case with the above Buddhist quote.. Its easy to say and understand that "desire is the cause", but hard to follow. So we took the easy route "Skip the quote and keep desiring"...

Now, how should one go about killing his desire? That isn't a easy job since "desires" keep the life moving. If you just "empty your teacup" in a second, you will find no meaning to live. Who knows, you can even go mad. 

This is where the above quote from Ovvaiyar comes handy. It breaks down this Buddhist quote into an easy and a followable pattern. Instead of just emptying the cup in a shot, it tells us that "there is no suffering to you from anything that you don't desire". It lets use choose our desire and kill it to overcome suffering. A step-by-step approach. For example, a vegetarian doesnt have suffering as long as he doenst desire to eat meat. But once he desires, he need to accept the "suffering" that comes along with his desire. Same case for every thing. As long as you don't desire money, it wont harm you. Once you "desire" money, you run into suffering. Now there comes few related questions... 

  1. What is the limit for "desire"? 
  2. Should i not desire money? 
  3. How do i live without money?


The answer is simple. If you are "earning money to live" there is no desire. Its all about satisfying your needs for survival. But when you turn "live to earn money".. you get an additional bonus pack of "suffering" along with that. It brings you great disappointment if you cannot earn money when you live for it. You will find that money has taken over your life. Identifying the suffering is to keep a close-watch on your desires (or) watch your desires to avoid suffering.

Having said that, lets do a quick retrospect of ourselves. List down five items that you desire the most [Exclude your life-partner from this list :)..]. Think of the suffering they pose to you. No suffering, the desire is good to go. Higher the suffering, reduce the intensity of the desire (or) avoid it...If at all one desire from your list falls down, Ovvaiyar quote had serve its purpose. If list turns completely empty, the world got one more Buddha.

Now the Climax - Lets not wait for any Buddhist monk in red-clad and shaved-head sitting with mount Everest in background saying us to "empty your teacup". Lets spill our cup drop-by-drop..One day, we will find our teacup empty... 

PS - Though the phrase "empty your teacup" is widely used to represent "learn to unlearn", I  kind of use it to represent "kill your desire".

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Aaranya Kaandam - Review




Biased with a lot of negative reviews, I started watching this film "Aaranya Kaandam" online, purely out of curiosity. And to be honest, the film stunned me out. I have never imagined a director who could bring such underworld happenings to limelight without compromising on story. Most of such stories are seen in only in Hollywood or Bollywood [Courtesy RGV], and its good to see such original script in Tamil.

So, here goes my postmortem of the film.

Abstract  - A day in the life of a gangster. Sampath working under Jackie Sheroff tries to double-cross a drug dealing belonging to other gang. Due to other incidents the drug gets into the hands of innocent kid and his father who tries to negotiate with the gangster for a mere peanut amount. After lot of other twists, turns and gang-wars the film ends with a unexpected climax. Ok, I know you couldn't get the story with whatever I scribbled in the last few lines, but believe this is how the story goes. Completely unexpected and full of twists. Watch it to enjoy.



Plus
1. Unexpected and perfectly crafted story play
2. Sampath - He carries the film on his shoulders
3. Jackie - One more "nayagan" after Kamal. Perfect actor. Initial scene where he beats his partner for his impotence - no one can doubt whether he acts or caught with candid camera
4. Ravi Krishna - Definitely better than 7G. Matured acting
5. Cast and Crew - Every single character is justified. The guy who literates audience on how to correct aunties, [I believe he is from chennai-28 crew?] is perfectly portrayed. Leave apart the Rajini-Kamal controversy in the dialogue. He has done a perfect job.
6. Kodukkapuli and this father - Though this kid is one among other character, he stands apart in this film. We can watch the film for this kid alone. His dialogue delivery and action are Class-A. His expression of anger, fun, intelligence, innocence, disability.. damn-good.
7. Dialogue - Razor sharp. If its one or two dialogues that Iam impressed, I could quote them here as examples. But every dialogue is worth a watch. Few dialogues delivered visually are amazing, like Jackie doubting Ravikrishna just by his massage style itself.  Most of the dialogues delivered by Kodukkapuli to his father/Sampath is excellent. I again say, its worth watching the complete film for this kid alone. Natural and matured acting from the first scene. Though many comments said there are lot of unparliamentary words, I never felt like that. Its obvious that one should not expect pure tamil in gangster movies like this. But, its definitely not over dosed.
8. Screenplay - I started watching this movie with one thing in mind "If the movie goes with the reviews I read in the first 15mins, I will better sleep". But 115 mins, I couldnt stop watching despite my Internet usage running out of quota :).
9. Camera work - I dont know much about this, and i obviously watched a degraded version of this movie online. But high quality stills online proves it should definitely be great. Cock-fight should be a feast to watch.
10. Music - Yuvan has done a great job. He keeps the movie flying and knots us to the edge of the seat. BGM like 7G. Few places where it was full of violence, the BGM played really soothened the scenes. Just experience it. And I dont remember any songs in this movie.
11. Story - Excellently crafted mix of 3 different stories in this movie
a) Sampath trying to double cross - Complete gangster story line
b) RaviKrishna's affair with Jackie Sherrofs lady [Yasmeen]
c) Story of Kodukkapuli and his father who was once Jameen, and lost all his wealth now due to his bad habits
12. Intelligence - Who said gansters are fools. Movie full of interesting twists. Just a sample is how Sampath escapes from a grid-lock,and how the other guys responds with "Kasthuriya naanga paathukkarom" reply. Nice touch.

Enough of Pro's now Con's
May be Iam really pissed-off after watching Avan Ivan, and hence couldnt find any big negatives in this film. But still,
1. Could have reduced the Sampath's running scene, chased by opposite gangsters. Though the scene is vital, some more editing could have been done
2. BGM at times was not racy. Yuvan has tried a mexican type of music for one of the chasing scenes. Though its a bit new to see such visuals, it reduces the intensity of the scene.

Good-thing
1. Such stories coming in tamil
2. Charan's effort to release despite such negative spread

Bad-thing
1. Our cine guys spreading such very negative views. One of the review read, "Does charan need to release this movie after 52 cuts". When censor can allow Vijayakanth spinning a top around Sukanya's navel, therez nothing wrong in movies like this. A movie of this creed cannot be less intense. Long back i remember a movie "en uyir thozhan" or something directed by Bharathiraja that portrays the life of rickshaw folks in a slum. I still remember few raw words used in that film. No rowdi will speak "hello madam, i want to kill you pls..."
2. In Jaya TV review, Suhashini was questioning on "What message this film gives to audience". My answer to her will be
  a) Cinema is just an entertainment medium and not a school/library for audience to get message. If you need message, go to Sathsang/Mass.
   b) What message did her husband's film "Raavan" carry. Dont trust your wife (or) use your wife as bait?

Vulgar 
1. Few inparliamentary words/scenes are there in the film, but most of them are censored/beeped. Other escaped words, doesnt make big impact and they are needed to carry the film.
2. A scene where Jackie appears nude [scrambled] - I dont think this scene created embarassment like GK did in Avan Ivan. This scene, though could have been avoided, aptly did fit into the movie.

Overall
Since censor board has scissored all the worst part of this movie, whats being released doesnt create that much negative impact when watching. Though not a family entertainer, anyone who wants to watch a action-packed thriller plus a racy gangster entertainer can definitely watch this one. After parthiban's award-winning "Housefull" this is the second movie I felt that went crisp and racy. Even "Saroja" was kind of this movie, but that had lot of family entertainer stuff and out of logic scenes. This movie did have some out of logic scenes, but not worth considering. One big mistake was not even a single police was shown as if the complete department was transferred out of Tamil Nadu. But remember that the full story happens within a day and we cannot expect police to react soon. Enough of writing, now its time for you guys to watch the film and update the comments with your views.

Rating - 3.5/5

Saturday, June 18, 2011

Avan Ivan - My Take


Review - Avan Ivan
Pre-requisite - Watch the film...
Now - Read further...





Review
Great that you watched the film... Only plus in the movie is Vishal acting.. Let it be his look or voice modulation or his sitting style... He rules.. Other side, I dont think GK [highness] acting is very great [except few scenes like where he has clash with Arya and asks him to go out]... Bala was once saying that GK performance will be talked close to Sivaji's performance.. After watching the movie, I dont think Bala is true.. GK's performance is good, but not comparable or even near to Sivaji in acting aspect. Just think of Sivaji's performance in "Mudhal Mariyadhai" or the classic "Devar Magan".. That is what I call "performance".. We cannot see the charector anywhere out of the film.. But here i can see GK "acting" in many scenes. Quite not natural. I would rate the Pithamagan villan [ganja dealer] acting more than GK's performance. He was natural and excellent.


Another hope i had in the film was RK [villan]. First few scenes he appeared, his mannerism and look was classic.. But later he was just portrayed one other villan and beaten to death. Very bad on Bala.

RK - Villan
One main thing missing was "story".... Earlier films of Bala had a very good story-line, let it be sethu or pithamagan or naan kadavul.. They had a very strong and appealing story line.. But here the story is completely missing.. Like Siva said, just few scenes tied around with comedy factor.. Bala could have given a strong warning to audience for not to expect too much out of this..

Annoying Scenes
1. Ambica fight with her sakkalathi... Lengthy..
2. Arya's scene with GK after Vishal gets appreciation from Surya
3. Love between Vishal and Baby... [in one review, they asked about how such girls love Vishal like charector]
4. Arya - tried to be like Surya in pithamagan.. but failed.. but he can feel happy about acting in Naan Kadavul.. Thats his masterpiece.

No Logic
1. Judge granting Arya to use his Car
2. Police releasing Arya/Vishal even after they messed up with three departments
3. Heroines loving Arya/Vishal like charectors
4. Villan RK running such a business is not known to GK/Police/Bluecross earlier

Kodumai
1. GK clad off and getting beaten by RK
2. Police Inspector giving treat [Briyani] to old accused.. 
3. The fat little boy always speaking

Paavam
1. Both the heroines
2. Audience

What the hell
1. Story line
2. Need for heroine and two hero's

Why Bala messes up with
1. Christianity - even in naan kadavul pooja goes to church - atleast that has some meaning, but here the church scene makes no sense
2. Islam - Questions kurbani?.. on why blue cross fails to stop transporting camels for killing in this function..

Leeenghty
1. First half
2. Arya/Vishal performance after seeing GK hanged
3. RK killing GK
4. GK getting insulted by forest officer

Comedy
1. Police as usual... comedy pieces [Don't we have a inspector who can get the s*** out of such thieves]

Music
1. Nice BGM
2. First song [Vishal intro]

Plus
1. Vishal performance
2. Camera work [Rain Scene, Climax fight]
3. RK's performance during his intro
4. Intro song for Vishal
5. GK performance after his clash with Arya [before he goes to their house in rain at night]
6. Ambica at times..

Vulgar
1. Ambica scolding Arya
2. GK clad-off [The scene was more embarassing than sympathetic]
3. Vishal asking Baby about zip in pants... 

Good thing
1. No psycho charector like other Bala films
2. Movie ended in 2.3 hrs
3. OC cinema sponsored by Siva
4. Popcorn sponsored by Mahesh?

Looks like
1. Sequel of Pithamagan
2. Copy/Paste of his different works

Same old style
1. Vishal resembling Pithamagan vikram
2. Heroine's friend opening up geometry box using her mouth
3. Both the heroines acting like "pappa's".. arent they matured?

Could have been best
1. Crisp scene in first half -  reducing the comedy part
2. Portraying RK more RAW.. - Climax not worth the build-up given to him

Expectation
1. Even if it takes two more years, Bala should think of an off-beat film like Pithamagan or Naan Kadavul. 

Rating - 2.5/5


Madhu shalini
Janani Iyer


- Raguraman